Pure Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant Liver Tumor: Anatomic Resection Versus Nonanatomic Resection / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been considered to be safe and feasible. However, few studies focused on the comparison between the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative factors and outcomes of the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR, especially the area of liver parenchymal transection and blood loss per unit area.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>In this study, surgical and oncological data of patients underwent pure LLR procedures for malignant liver tumor were prospectively collected. Blood loss per unit area of liver parenchymal transection was measured and considered as an important parameter. All procedures were conducted by a single surgeon.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>During nearly 5 years, 84 patients with malignant liver tumor received a pure LLR procedure were included. Among them, 34 patients received anatomic LLR and 50 received nonanatomic LLR, respectively. Patients of the two groups were similar in terms of demographic features and tumor characteristics, despite the tumor size was significantly larger in the anatomic LLR group than that in the nonanatomic LLR group (4.77 ± 2.57 vs. 2.87 ± 2.10 cm, P = 0.001). Patients who underwent anatomic resection had longer operation time (364.09 ± 131.22 vs. 252.00 ± 135.21 min, P < 0.001) but less blood loss per unit area (7.85 ± 7.17 vs. 14.17 ± 10.43 ml/cm 2 , P = 0.018). Nonanatomic LLR was associated with more blood loss when the area of parenchymal transection was equal to the anatomic LLR. No mortality occurred during the hospital stay and 30 days after the operation. Moreover, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. The disease-free and overall survival rates showed no significant differences between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Both anatomic and nonanatomic pure LLR are safe and feasible. Measuring the area of parenchymal transection is a simple and effective method to estimate the outcomes of the liver resection surgery. Blood loss per unit area is an important parameter which is comparable between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.</p>

Clinicopathologic features, diagnosis and treatment with solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a report of 33 cases / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features, biological behavior, diagnosis and treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective clinical and clinicopathologic analysis was made on 33 cases of SPTP admitted from May 2001 to 2010 July. There were 7 male and 26 female patients, aging from 13 to 66 years with a mean of 34.3 years.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The tumor was located in pancreatic head of 10 patients, in pancreatic neck of 5 patients, in pancreatic body and tail of 18 patients. Of the 33 patients treated with surgery, 8 underwent simple resection of pancreatic tumor, 6 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 3 underwent tumor resection plus pancreaticojejunostomy, 1 underwent tumor resection plus pancreaticogastrostomy, 11 underwent distal pancreatectomy, 4 underwent distal pancreatectomy plus spleen resection (1 underwent mesohepatectomy for hepatic metastasis). Sixteen of the 33 operations were completed by laparoscopy. Histologically, tumors were composed of papillary and microcystic solid structures, with uniformed population of cells. The pancreas and blood vessels invasion were identified in 3 cases, one of them was combined with liver metastasis, and they are male. Immunohistologically, the tumors were positive for α1-antitrypsin, α1-antichymotrypsin, β-catenin, CD10, CD56 and vimentin (all cases), neuron-specific enolase (3 cases), synaptophysin (6 cases), chromogranin A (4 cases), progesterone receptor (28 cases), estrogen receptor (3 cases), S-100 (6 cases). Totally 33 cases were followed up with a median period of 49 months without tumor recurrence.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>SPTP is of low graded malignancy. It primarily affects young women. It may be located in any part of pancreas. Immunohistochemistry is very important for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SPTP. Surgical resection is recommended as the treatment of choice. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy or tumor resection is feasible and safe for some selected patients, and the prognosis is good.</p>

Pyoderma gangrenosum: a report of 3 cases / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To improve the surgeon's understanding of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and avoid misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Three cases of PG managed in the department of general surgery during the past 10 years were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All of the 3 cases mainly presented with necrosis of skin and soft tissues, followed by formation of painful and extensive creeping ulcer. They all had fever and were initially diagnosed and managed as "infection", but repeated wound exudates culture showed negative results and antimicrobial therapy was not effective. The ulcers were enlarged quickly despite of active debridement. Histopathology of ulcer biopsy suggested nonspecific inflammation. After the diagnosis of PG was established, systemic therapy with steroids and immunosuppressants were administered together with local wound care. The progress of the disease was controlled soon and fully resolved finally.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Pyoderma gangrenosum is misdiagnosed frequently. For severe patients, systemic therapy with steroids and immunosuppressants should be used as early as possible and skin lesions would heal together with mild local wound care.</p>